Gauge how crappy you are feeling by your initial response to the subject matter. Then read on for some exceptionally interesting material – if you have the guts for it.
As the Japanese children’s book author Tarō Gomi once wrote: everyone poops. But we don’t talk about this openly or often enough. In fact, talking and reading about poop might make you want to hold your nose — but it’ll also open your eyes. Here are eight pieces about shit, from a DIY mixture a woman used to treat her life-threatening infection, to prehistoric poo that brings us one step closer to understanding the origins of life after the dinosaur age.
“The Magic Poop Potion” (Lina Zeldovich, Narratively)
Suffering from a recurring intestinal infection called C. diff, Catherine Duff decided to take matters into her own hands. Using healthy stool from her husband, they concocted an unconventional cocktail — using a plastic enema, blender, and a cheese cloth — which he then transferred into her. This procedure, known as fecal microbiota transplant (FMT), saved her life. Duff advocated for FMT as a viable treatment…
View original post 685 more words
Firstly, if you are confident that gut instinct is BS, save your time. This note will seem like nonsense to you. Stop reading now or read Kahneman’s “Thinking, Fast and Slow” if you have a year to spare.
Alright, so here we go. Decisions.
We should – if we are smart and human – be frequently wrestling with doubt or pros/cons type argument in our heads.
Sometimes a decision feels wrong (in our gut). In this case it is not a bad idea to try and chase down why the feeling is there in the first place.
Most of the time we let such feelings operate on us unrestrained. Unconsciously letting them drive a quick action randomly or crushing them reflexively. This results in unfortunate behavior most of the time. There might be times of course where the spontaneous toggling of mental mistakes work out fine purely by chance – but the odds aren’t easily calculated.
A more conscious approach starts with recognizing and describing the gut instinct – probably the toughest thing for many of us to do. This needs patience, practice and self-awareness, among many other things.
The follow up, after identifying this “gut-instinct”, now broken-down with incidence rate stats:
50% – you resolve it consciously in 30 seconds or so one way/another
25% – resolution might take a couple of minutes of careful thinking
15% – you write it down and think about it over several hours with additional research (related content from other people)
5% – you might need to also talk to objective people you trust over several days to resolve
The last 5% – Ahh, the moments that shape our lives. These tough choices define us. Anyone giving you quick answers to these doubts should be quickly ignored. These are the choices that can take months, years or decades to figure out. They leave our lives to form in their wake.
Now a personal corollary to the above is that when I go too many days without recognizing the last 5% clearly I am probably screwing up in a number of unknowable ways.
PS: I thought a bit more than a minute before posting this note to the blog
Google makes it so much easier for me to find those annoying facts that are distant in my mind. Seems like I am therefore less inclined to develop that mental faculty? Do we know the consequences of not “stretching” our brain connections and recall ability?
Some content on the topic:
Cognitive self-esteem was significantly higher for those who had just used the Internet to search for answers … using Google gives people the sense that the Internet has become part of their own cognitive tool set …We are simply merging the self with something greater, forming a transactive partnership not just with other humans but with an information source more powerful than any the world has ever seen.
When it comes to the computerization of knowledge work, writes John Lee of the University of Iowa, “a less-automated approach, which places the automation in the role of critiquing the operator, has met with much more success” than the typical practice of supplanting human judgment with machine calculations. The best decision-support systems provide professionals with “alternative interpretations, hypotheses, or choices.”
If participants took a photo of each object as a whole, they remembered fewer objects and remembered fewer details about the objects and the objects’ locations in the museum than if they instead only observed the objects and did not photograph them.
Sounds exciting but I am still not sure why.
1. Physicists mapped unstuff they call Dark matter using a 570 megapixel digital camera (~10X the camera on the rumored Chinese smart phone called Oppo)
2. Shouldn’t they at least try to explain why this *matters*? No one I know seems to care
2. Determine importance
3. Make connections (text to text/self/world)
4. Ask questions
5. Make predictions, conclusions
6. Synthesize (retell briefly)
7. Know if and why you don’t understand (change tactics to fix)
I have been staying a bit more regular with posts on LinkedIn. Closer to figuring out the mix of posts between this personal blog and my professional communication platform which will definitely remain as LinkedIn.
More to come.
Letting go is hard, when the pursuit of pleasure meets the uncertainty of a changing climate.
This, apparently, is how you trap a monkey:
First, you need to find a place where monkeys hang out. Of course, this will be an easier prospect in Delhi than it is in, say, Dubbo – for reasons that should be self evident. Next, find a heavy flagon or urn – something that’s about the same weight as the monkey you want to catch, with an opening just large enough for the monkey to get it’s hand in. Then, in full view of the monkey, place the vessel on the ground and drop something small inside. Peanuts are good, but to a curious monkey anything you put in there might just prove irresistible; so a hand full of pebbles may suffice. Finally, stand back and watch. If all goes to plan, an inquisitive monkey…
View original post 955 more words